Election advantages due to district mapping
- Updated
“Gerrymandering” state and Congressional elections in favor of partisans can be hard to judge. The AP used a formula called the "efficiency gap" to measure the degree of partisan advantage across states in the 2022 election, after all states were required to reconfigure districts to account for population changes over the previous decade. Republicans won a slim 222-213 majority over Democrats in the U.S. House and also won control of a majority of state legislative chambers. AP found those net results more accurately reflected the preferences of voters than during the previous decade, when the GOP had a stronger advantage.
The efficiency gap measures partisan advantage on a statewide basis. In a perfectly balanced election, the efficiency gap would be zero. The further a gap score moves from zero, the greater the partisan advantage.
Related to this collection
Donald Trump's Republican rivals are facing a high-stakes dilemma as they grapple with the politics of the former president's federal indictment.
Donald Trump appeared in Michigan on Sunday evening as he looks to reclaim territory that helped propel him to the White House but slipped from his grasp four years later.
After an anemic showing in the midterms, Republicans have virtually no cushion in their quest to retain control of the House.
President Joe Biden is staking his reelection bid on the political and financial muscle of the Democratic National Committee as his campaign prepares for a bruising 2024 contest.
Alabama lawmakers have refused to create a second majority-Black congressional district, a move that could defy an order from the U.S. Supreme Court to give minority voters a greater voice in elections and trigger a renewed battle over the state’s political map. The debate is being closely watched across the nation and could be mirrored in fights in Louisiana, Georgia, Texas and other states.
False claims scorch through social media sites that advocates say fuel election misinformation in communities of color.
At a moment of growing legal peril, Donald Trump has ramped up calls for his Republican rivals to drop out of the 2024 presidential race.
Federal judges in Georgia and Texas are putting on hold provisions of two controversial laws passed as part of a GOP push to tighten voting regulations.
Democrats hailed Wisconsin’s new district maps as a major political victory in the swing state where the Legislature has been firmly under Republican control for more than a decade.
The lawsuit comes days after Justice Janet Protasiewicz was sworn into office, giving liberals a 4-3 majority on the state's highest court.
The proposal comes as the Wisconsin Supreme Court may accept two lawsuits alleging the current Republican-drawn boundaries are unconstitutional.
Republicans have said their redistricting proposal reflects the Iowa redistricting model that Democrats have endorsed and promoted in Wisconsin. There are a few key differences.
"To sum up my views, there should be no effort to impeach Justice Protasiewicz on anything we know now," David Prosser wrote to Robin Vos.
"Everybody knows the reason we're here is because there was a change in the membership of the court," conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley said seconds into the hearing.
Once the Wisconsin Elections Commission has maps, officials begin the process of incorporating the new boundaries into the statewide voter database WisVote.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court last month ruled that the current legislative maps are unconstitutional because many districts aren’t contiguous, forcing the adoption of new maps.
Gerrymandering isn't new, but experts say a small number of pending redistricting battles could help determine which party controls the U.S. House of Representatives after this year's elections.
The recall effort was launched in January by supporters of Donald Trump frustrated that Vos has refused the former president's request to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
The Supreme Court has preserved a Republican-held South Carolina congressional district, rejecting a lower-court ruling the district discriminated against Black voters.

